A milestone for mental health: Denmark’s 10–year plan as a model for international reform

Theme: Editorials

---

In recent years, mental health has moved steadily upward on political agendas across Europe, yet few countries have succeeded in transforming ambition into sustained, long–term investment. Denmark has now taken a decisive step that marks a turning point–both nationally and potentially for other health systems. With the Parliament’s broad political agreement to finance a comprehensive 10–year plan for psychiatry, Denmark has established a durable framework designed to raise the quality of mental health care to the same standard expected for physical health. This achievement represents not only a national milestone, but also a policy blueprint that other countries may be able to adapt and follow.

The 10–year plan builds on a detailed and evidence–informed proposal from the Danish Health Authority, which distilled five central challenges facing Danish mental health care: insufficient capacity across services; lack of coordination and interdisciplinarity; inadequate prevention and early intervention; persistent stigma and inequality; and insufficient research and professional development. These challenges are not uniquely Danish. They are shared across the Nordic region and, indeed, much of Europe. What sets Denmark apart is the magnitude and specificity of the financial and structural commitment that has now been made.

At the core of the plan is a sustained increase in public investment. Denmark has committed to increasing the psychiatric budget by approximately 35 percent – an unprecedented and permanent expansion. This level of investment reflects a recognition that severe mental disorders carry societal and economic costs equal to, if not greater than, many long–term somatic conditions. Schizophrenia alone ranks among the top ten disorders in terms of combined health–care expenditure and lost productivity, and it is associated with an average loss of 19 working years. These facts have been central in mobilizing political will, alongside national efforts to reduce stigma and a strong coalition of stakeholders advocating for reform.

Denmark’s new plan is distinguished by its comprehensiveness across the full continuum of care. The country has long been internationally recognized for its early intervention services, particularly the OPUS model, which offers multidisciplinary, assertive, family–oriented care for individuals experiencing a first episode of psychosis. The evidence base for OPUS is robust: randomized trials and real–world cohort studies demonstrate reduced hospitalizations, improved functioning, and lower long–term costs. The new national plan ensures that OPUS will be strengthened, expanded, and supplemented by additional capacity in flexible assertive community treatment (FACT), outreach teams for vulnerable groups, and specialised inpatient units.

Denmark faces shortages of psychiatrists and psychologists, and the demand for services continues to exceed available capacity. Expanding specialist training programs is a necessary step, but workforce development will require sustained attention.

Equally important, Denmark is extending early intervention further upstream. Coverage for youth is being expanded with OPUS Young, and preventive initiatives such as headspace are being implemented nationally. These services create accessible entry points for young people with emerging difficulties, many of whom might otherwise remain unidentified until a crisis presents. Nationwide monitoring through high–quality clinical databases supports both fidelity of implementation and ongoing quality improvement–another area where Denmark’s infrastructure is unusually well–developed and may serve as a model for other countries.

The Danish plan also addresses longstanding gaps in physical health care for people with severe mental illness. Mortality from cardiovascular and metabolic diseases remains unacceptably high among psychiatric populations, and there is clear evidence of underdiagnosis and undertreatment. Denmark’s response includes new structures for integrated care: designated general practitioners in supported housing facilities, extended annual consultations for individuals with severe mental illness, and local pilots integrating psychiatry with internal medicine and endocrinology. While these initiatives are at different stages of maturity, the national plan provides the opportunity for systematic evaluation and broader implementation.

Another notable element of the Danish reform is its attention to societal and relational dimensions of mental illness. National rollout of evidence–based psychoeducation for caregivers is underway in partnership with Better Psychiatry (Bedre Psykiatri). Strengthened family involvement is both clinically effective and cost–efficient, yet it remains poorly implemented in many countries. Denmark’s decision to embed such interventions within a national strategy is exemplary.

Similarly, there is a clear commitment to reducing coercion, strengthening patient involvement, and supporting social inclusion. The plan prioritizes employment and education through national expansion of Individual Placement and Support (IPS), and it reinforces Housing First as the guiding model for addressing homelessness among individuals with severe mental illness. These policies reflect a broad understanding of recovery that includes autonomy, participation, and community integration.

Denmark’s new plan is distinguished by its comprehensiveness across the full continuum of care. The country has long been internationally recognized for its early intervention services, particularly the OPUS model, which offers multidisciplinary, assertive, family–oriented care for individuals experiencing a first episode of psychosis. Image by Wix Media.

Crisis response is another pivotal focus. A national psychiatric helpline will be established and linked with strengthened acute outreach teams – many staffed by a psychiatrist and an ambulance driver–capable of intervening rapidly in the community. This approach aligns with WHO recommendations and represents a scalable model for countries seeking alternatives to police–led crisis response. Alongside this, Denmark has adopted a national suicide prevention plan with dedicated funding for post–discharge interventions, suicide prevention clinics, and targeted approaches to non–suicidal self–harm.

Crucially, the Danish 10–year plan is not solely about service expansion. It embeds a research strategy with permanent state funding of EUR 22 million annually, supplemented by strong philanthropic contributions. This investment secures Denmark’s capacity to continue generating high–quality evidence, developing innovative treatments – including virtual reality–assisted therapy for auditory hallucinations – and leading large–scale epidemiological studies. By linking research, clinical practice, and national monitoring, Denmark is creating an integrated ecosystem that few countries currently possess.

Of course, major challenges remain. Denmark faces shortages of psychiatrists and psychologists, and the demand for services continues to exceed available capacity. Expanding specialist training programs is a necessary step, but workforce development will require sustained attention. Implementation across five regions can introduce variability in practice; quality standards and national clinical guidelines will need strategic support to ensure uniform delivery. And although financing has been secured, the coming decade will test whether political consensus can be preserved across electoral cycles.

Despite these challenges, Denmark’s achievement stands out in a European context characterized by fragmented reforms and limited long–term planning. Several features of the Danish approach may be especially instructive for other countries: grounding political decisions in strong epidemiological and economic evidence; uniting diverse stakeholders behind a shared vision; building reforms around proven models such as early intervention and IPS; investing in research and national data infrastructure; and insisting that psychiatric care must match the quality and coherence of care offered in somatic specialties.

The Danish 10–year plan for psychiatry represents a rare combination of ambition, evidence, and political commitment. If the plan is implemented with fidelity, Denmark has the potential not only to transform its own mental health system, but also to demonstrate that sustained, system–level reform in psychiatry is both achievable and cost–effective. Other countries seeking to modernize their mental health services – Nordic and otherwise – may find in Denmark’s experience a tangible example of what is possible when mental health is treated as a national priority. □